Guiding Cases and Typical Cases Recently Issued by the Supreme People's Court
I. The 48th Group of Guiding Cases issued by the Supreme People's Court(Guiding Cases No. 268–272)
Guiding Case No. 268: Yan Mincong case of endangering public security by dangerous means
Guiding Case No. 269: Liu Jiang case of acquittal for traffic accident
Guiding Case No. 270: Cheng Mingming case of dangerous driving
Guiding Case No. 271: Wang Qun case of dangerous driving
Guiding Case No. 272: Ai Mou et al. case of dangerous driving
II. The 49th Group of Guiding Cases issued by the Supreme People's Court(Guiding Cases No. 273–279)
Guiding Case No. 273: Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. et al. v. Wemotor Automobile Manufacturing (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd. et al. (infringement of technical secrets dispute)
Guiding Case No. 274: Qingdao Qingzhong Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. v. Qingdao Chenji Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. (infringement of utility model patent right dispute)
Guiding Case No. 275: Jiangsu Jinshuo Seed Industry Technology Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Qinmin Agricultural Industry Development Co., Ltd. (infringement of new plant variety right dispute)
Guiding Case No. 276: Novozymes A/S v. China National Intellectual Property Administration & Dai Daliang (administrative dispute over invalidation of invention patent right)
Guiding Case No. 277: Jiangsu Hongxin Rotary Compensator Technology Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Yuanyou Bellows Co., Ltd. et al. (infringement of invention patent right dispute)
Guiding Case No. 278: Fujian Hengke Technology Co., Ltd. v. Quanzhou Riyi Flow Instrument Co., Ltd. (liability for damages caused by malicious intellectual property litigation dispute)
Guiding Case No. 279: Siemens Industrial Software Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Womo Mould Co., Ltd. (infringement of computer software copyright dispute)
III. Typical Cases of People's Courts Punishing Crimes Against Property Such as Telecom and Online Fraud in Accordance with the Law
Case 1: Defendant Yu Mobo et al. (14 persons) fraud case– Severe punishment of ringleaders of cross-border telecom and online fraud criminal groups.
Case 2: Defendant Xu Yu’nan et al. (9 persons) fraud case– Punishment of persons who induce paid training under the pretext of recruitment to commit fraud.
Case 3: Defendant Wu Wentao fraud case– Punishment of persons who assist AI voice‑simulating fraud by offline cash withdrawal.
Case 4: Defendant You Youlong et al. (9 persons) case of assisting cybercrime activities– Leniency for “two-card” offenders who voluntarily compensate victims.
Case 5: Defendant Zhong Liangliang case of covering up or concealing criminal proceeds– Punishment of persons who cover up criminal proceeds by “purchasing” second‑hand luxury goods.
IV. Typical Cases of Substantially Resolving Conflicts and Disputes issued by the SPC (First Batch)
Case 1: An installation company v. a property company (contract dispute)– Consolidated trial of related disputes to promote comprehensive settlement.
Case 2: Liu Jiang v. administrative organ (housing ownership registration case)– Concurrent handling of civil disputes in administrative cases to clarify rights and obligations.
V. Typical Cases of Substantially Resolving Conflicts and Disputes issued by the SPC (Second Batch)
Case 1: Zhang v. Cao Fangfang (service contract dispute)– Patient explanation and guidance to help parties exercise litigation rights in accordance with the law.
Case 2: Hu Nini, Fan Fengfeng v. a nursery service company & a taekwondo gym (service contract dispute)– Using alternative claims to achieve one‑off substantive resolution.
Case 3: Zheng Chenchen v. Li Qun, Ye Jing, a speed delivery company (product liability dispute)– No recognition of adding defendants to create jurisdictional connections.