Xu Jun, Partner of Shanghai K-Insight Law Firm. He joined Shanghai K-Insight Law Firm as a full-time lawyer in April 2006, with over 16 years of experience in the areas of intellectual property, corporate legal consulting, corporate restructuring, reorganization and M&A, corporate management buyouts and equity incentives, private equity and venture capital, banking and financing.

Social Positions and Honors

• Member of the Shanghai Committee of the China Democratic League
• Special Mediator of Shanghai Pudong New Area Intellectual Property Mediation Committee 

Professional Specialty

• Corporate legal advisor

Xu Jun has provided perennial or special legal services for many famous enterprises and companies, including but not limited to: real estate, high-tech, financial, transportation facilities, logistics and other enterprises and companies. He has provided counseling and training services to these companies, assisted them in drafting relevant documents to be reported for approval, assisted them in handling the approval procedures, assisted their management, and assisted the enterprises in IP management and layout.

• Intellectual property, corporate law, contract law, investment law, commercial trade law, being familiar with real estate and securities laws, and financial law

He has rich experience in providing legal services. With a strong background in science and technology, Mr. Xu also focuses on deepening his professional knowledge, assisting companies in IP management and layout, and has handled a large number of IP litigation cases; meanwhile, as a special mediator of Shanghai Pudong New Area Intellectual Property Mediation Committee, Mr. Xu has participated in the successful mediation of many cases of disputes over the trademark, copyright and patent (including participation in court mediation).

Typical Cases

• The appearance design infringement litigation of an animation enterprise in Shanghai (the defendant was a toy company and a shopping mall in Wenzhou, and the case ended with damages awarded to the plaintiff)
• The utility model infringement litigation case of a cell phone chain enterprise in Shanghai (after the trial, it was finally found that it did not constitute infringement, and the enterprise's reputation and market credibility were maintained)
• The appearance design infringement litigation case of a building material enterprise in Shandong (after careful verification of technical documents and physical objects, subtle differences were found in the articulation and outer periphery of the structure, and based on the shape characteristics, it was identified not to constitute similarity)
• A litigation case in which the external packaging bag design of a food enterprise in Anhui was infringed upon (through concentrated litigation and a large amount of patents, the infringing party was made able to respond to the litigation and forced to resort to mediation)
• The litigation case of that the software copyright of Shanghai XX Network Information Technology Co., Ltd. was infringed upon (a large number of evidence on the other party’s infringement and sales was obtained via investigation to obtain a large amount of compensation)
• The case that a furniture company in Shanghai was sued for appearance design patent infringement (the case was finally settled by mediation)

The case that a game company (listed company) in Shanghai was sued for copyright infringement (the original litigation claimed a compensation of RMB100 million, which was eventually reduced to more than RMB20 million), etc.